First of all, she gave good detail about their lives and that time period; also about the process that the men went through deciding to go to Ecuador in the first place, and then to attempt to meet the Aucas.
Secondly, I was surprised by the realism of the book. So many things about these missionaries have been written over the years that they are larger than life figures. But nobody is above dealing with a sinful nature, issues of pride, hurting other people at times. This book was written realistically and was thus refreshing to read.
And finally, the foreward of the book explored some of the aftermath of the grief process that these families were left to deal with after the death of the five missionaries. It is worthy of contemplating today, about any tragedy. Olive's second husband wrote this, starting on p. 11:
“During the course of our life together Olive and I have
often struggled with the question of why it happened that five young
men—strong, and gifted, each needed in another part of the missionary endeavor,
each married, each (except Pete) a father—were allowed to die. Olive clung to the belief that God had
prepared her for it, but had He prepared the events themselves? Was it all evil and the work of demons
or the Devil? Was it an
unfortunate tragedy? Did God do it
deliberately?
“Many have attempted to justify what happened by the
results. Do the scores or hundreds
of people who were inspired to consider becoming missionaries justify it? Do the hundreds of Aucas who became
Christians explain its purpose?
Does the abandonment of mutual killing among the Aucas (except for a
remote group still in darkness) warrant the loss? How about the fact that all of the killers became believers
and that three of them are now pastors and evangelists? Does any of this say to us, ‘THIS is
why it happened’? If so, then the
next question is: Was the infinitely wise and powerful God unable to find a way
other than to sacrifice the lives of such men as these, and five of them at
that? All such talk about this
subject is, of course, hindsight.
“Bring in the theologians and the philosophers. Let them sit with grieving widows and
philosophize about whether God causes, contributes, allows, redirects, or
whatever. Is God’s will cold or
loving? Is His will impersonal
fate or personal care? Hidden or
understandable? To be feared or
embraced?
“Grief-stricken people are often ‘comforted’ with a Bible
verse popularly known by its reference, Romans 8:28: ‘We know that all things
work together for good for those who love God, who are called according to his
purpose.’ I put comforted in
quotes because the verse is sometimes quoted mechanically or insensitively, and
sometimes as a substitute for personal deeds of comfort. Some think a grieving person only needs
to apprehend a theological truth.
The message some think that the verse conveys is that we should welcome
evil or that evil always comes from God and is intended to accomplish some
hidden purpose.
“The verse, of course, does not say that. Nor does it say, on the contrary, that
all things are good. It does not
say that everything is directly caused by God. The Bible, in fact, calls death an ‘enemy’ (I Corinthians
15:26) and says that Christ died to destroy the Devil, ‘who has the power of
death’ (Hebrews 2:14). What Romans
8:28 does communicate is the truth that God can take all things – even bad ones
– and bring good from them for those who love Him. It teaches that God acts purposefully in calling us to faith
in Him. It reflects a loving God.”








